Sunday, April 27, 2008

Impact of Unclean Biofuels in Rural India

A study based on a survey of 15,293 rural households from 148 villages in three states of rural North India and one state in South India shows the importance of clean fuels. Following data was collected (Parikh Jyoti et al (2005)):
  • Symptoms of diseases related to air and water pollution
  • Expenditure on health.
  • Person days lost.
  • Demographic and socio-economic information.
  • Measurements of air quality in the kitchen, outside the kitchen and the home were collected.
  • Indicators for respiratory functions (Peak Expiratory Flow) were measured for most of the adults present at the time of the survey. 
The study estimated that• 96% of rural households used biomass energy, 11% use kerosene and 5% use LPG for cooking.• 314 Mt of bio-fuels are gathered annually, mostly by women, this may lead to a rural girl child to forgo her education.• 85 million households spend 30 billion hours annually in fuel wood gathering.• Respiratory symptoms are prevalent among 24 million adults of which 17 million have serious symptoms. Again mostly women due to their work being mostly indoors.• 5% of adults suffer from Bronchial asthma, 16% from Bronchitis, 8.2% from Pulmonary TB and 7% from Chest infection.
Net Economic Impact :
Total economic burden of unclean biomass fuel was estimated to be Rs.299 billion using a wage rate of Rs.60 per day multiplied by the no of houres used to gather primary fuel.
The study considers the opportunity cost of gathering fuel, working days lost due to eye infections and respiratory diseases, and the cost of medicine.
Women were found to be the primary sufferers of the adverse impact of use of biomass fuels. Gender and energy issues have remained on the periphery of energy policy, and require greater attention and backing.


Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Calculating friction factor using colebrook equation

Colebrook equation can be used for calculation of  friction factor in the pipes.The implicit form of the equation can be solved for (Re>4000) using Newton-Raphson Method.Following code can be used to solve the equation iteratively.


"D=.1; %diameter
Q=6;%flow
d=1;% density
u=.001;%viscocity
Vel=Q/(.25*pi*D^2); % velocity
Re=D*Vel*d/u % Reynolds number
f=64/Re; % initial guess
e=.0021;%roughness
ee=e/D
er=1;
n=1;
while er>1e-6
F =( 1/sqrt(f)+2*(log10( (e/(3.7*D))+(2.51/(Re*sqrt(f))))));
H=((e/(3.7*D))+(2.51/(Re*sqrt(f))));
G= -.5*f^-1.5+(.8686*( -1.255/(Re*f^1.5)))/H;
h=-F/G;
fn=f+h;
er=fn-f;
n=n+1;
f=fn;
end
n
er
fn
The next post will be on calculating exit velocity in a circular pipe.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Small Hydel project Sites in India

Small Hydel projects have some definite advantages like small investment required. Low or no impact to environment, low investment for transmission infrastructure and can meet local needs.These projects have low gestation periods and are good for remote localities.
The total installed capacity of small hydro power projects (up to 25 MW) as on 31.03.2007 is 1975 MW from 602 projects and 219 projects with aggregate capacity of 650 MW are under construction.
sr.No Name of State Identified no of sites Total Capacity in MW
1 Andhra Pradesh 377 250.50
2 ArunachalPradesh 452 1243.47
2 Assam 40 119.54
4 Bihar 74 149.35
5 Chhatisgarh 132 482.82
6 Goa 4 4.60
7 Gujarat 287 186.37
8 Haryana 23 36.55
9 Himachal Pradesh 457 2019.03
10 Jammu Kashmir 208 1294.43
11 Jharkhand 89 170.05
12 Karnataka 468 1940.31
13 Kerala 207 455.53
14 Madhya Pradesh 85 336.33
15 Maharashtra 221 484.50
16 Manipur 99 91.75
17 Meghalaya 90 197.32
18 Mizoram 53 135.93
19 Nagaland 84 149.31
20 Orissa 206 217.99
21 Punjab 204 270.18
22 Rajasthan 55 27.82
23 Sikkim 70 214.33
24 Tamil Nadu 155 373.46
25 Tripura 10 30.85
26 Uttar Pradesh 211 267.06
27 Uttaranchal 354 1478.24
28 West Bengal 141 213.50
29 A&N Island 5 1.15
TOTAL 4861 12,841.81


Top ad

Your Ad Here